Literacy with an Attitude- Finn
Compare and contrast Finn v.s Shalaby
Shalaby's Troublemakers and Patrick Finn's Literacy with an Attitude examine how societal attitudes of students from underprivileged backgrounds contribute to educational inequalities, though from distinct perspectives. In Shalaby's Troublemakers, the author looks at how young children, especially African American students, are branded as "problems" in the classroom, which results in harsh disciplinary measures that worsen exclusion rather than promote growth and understanding. Shalaby emphasizes the human cost of these designations by highlighting how adult views of deviance eclipse children's innate potential and need for nurture. She argues for compassionate teaching methods that accept kids for who they are, understanding that actions classified as "trouble" are frequently the result of systemic neglect and a lack of support rather than personal failings on the part of the kids.
In contrast, Finn's Literacy with an Attitude concentrates on the structural factors that influence literacy instruction, particularly how working-class children, are excluded from the empowering education that equips them to confront social power systems. Finn bases his argument on the fact that distinct forms of literacy instruction to children are placed on their social position in traditional schooling, which frequently maintains class divisions. While working-class kids learn "functional" literacy, which prepares them to obey directions and fill submissive roles in the workforce, middle-class and upper-class students learn "rich" literacy educations that encourage critical thinking and agency. Finn promotes "literacy with an attitude" as his stance.
Both writings criticize how schools perpetuate social hierarchies rather than attempting to equal the playing field. Shalaby concentrates on the psychological and personal effects of being called a "troublemaker" when still a child. At the same time, Finn examines the more institutional relationship between education and class that perpetuates inequity. Taken as a whole, they offer a thorough analysis of how school expectations that are both intellectual and behavioral restrict the potential of underprivileged students. They advocate for innovative methods that view education as a tool for liberation rather than control.
I also related Literacy With an Attitude to Shalaby and how the working-class school teachers saying, "do it this way or it's wrong" negatively impacts students especially considering Shalabys stance of how we need to listen and encourage instead of shut down.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed this comparison! It is so important to connect our readings together so we can become better educators. Both readings critique the environments in school today, but focus on different aspects. It was really interesting to read your comparison between the two, and the videos are a great touch!
ReplyDeleteI really liked how you compared "Literacy with an Attitude" to "Troublemakers." I also liked that you emphasized how both readings talk about how the education system perpetuates social hierarchies rather than trying to give all students equal opportunities to thrive in their education.
ReplyDeleteHi Michelina! I enjoyed reading your reflection this week! You bring up a great point in your contrast how Shalaby focuses on the psychological effects of being a "troublemaker", while Finn focuses on the institutional effects of one's social class. As people, we have multiple parts of our identities that work together to form us, and the systems that we are part of do the same. It is important to recognize that it is not just the education system as an institution that effects us, but our own personal challenges, too.
ReplyDeleteI liked your comparisons and videos you chose!
ReplyDelete